01.24.08

Quantum of Solace

Posted in Movies at 11:37 pm by brmeyer

Months of speculation all came to an end today. What is Quantum of Solace? It’s the name of the 22nd film in the James Bond series. It is an odd choice to be sure, and as with the previous Bond film, Casino Royale, fans once again have something to complain about. Last time, it was the choice of the actor to play the title character, namely Daniel Craig. The title is the topic of ranting for this moment. Those who are true fans of the series will recognize the title as the name of one of the short stories in Ian Fleming’s collection called For Your Eyes Only that was published in 1960. Though I have never read the story, I’ve read a summary of the story in which Bond played only a minor role. It would appear that the plot of this movie will not be based on that particular writing. So how does the title fit in with the continuation of the plot of Casino Royale?

It doesn’t take a miraculous amount of effort to define the words of the title. Quantum can be a significant quantity or bulk. Solace is defined as something that consoles or comforts. In Casino Royale, Bond lost his true love, Vesper Lynd, after being betrayed by her for reasons that have not yet completed unfolded in the reboot of the Bond franchise. As an aside, Quantum of Solace is the first true sequel in the Bond series as its plot follows exactly from that of the previous movie. This has never been done in the history of the 007 films. Casino Royale ended with Bond becoming a focused, yet angry, young agent whose sole purpose appears to be revenge. If revenge is the theme, then it is that which Bond will use as his tool to bring himself consolation for both the loss of his love and the betrayal which he anticipated yet opened himself up to due to that love. In that strict definition, the title fits exactly with the plot.

Quantum of Solace it is. It is cumbersome yet appropriate. I just feel sympathy for the singer that has to write the theme song.

Quantum of Solace Official Site

Quantum of Solace Logo

02.04.07

Letters from Iwo Jima

Posted in Movies at 8:07 pm by brmeyer

Letters from Iwo Jima

IMDB

Year: 2007

Writer: Iris Yamashita and Paul Haggis

Director: Clint Eastwood

Length: 140 min.

Category: War

Media: Film

Rating from : R (Restricted)

Rating: 5 out of 5

Jess and I spent last Saturday evening - the 27th of January - in Bridgeville to view the film Letters from Iwo Jima. Though directed by an American director, Clint Eastwood, the dialogue is entirely in Japanese with English subtitles. It is possible that that is the reason the movie is showing in only two theatres in Pittsburgh. Despite rave reviews from across the nation, it is doubtful that many would have the patience to read the subtitles and attempt to view the Battle of Iwo Jima from the perspective of the Japanese unless they have some special interest in World War II or the battle itself.

The movie, a companion to the recent movie Flags of Our Fathers which showed the American perspective of the Battle of Iwo Jima, focuses on several common Japanese soldiers and their trials and tribulations from being selected to join the army to avoiding certain death on the island of Iwo Jima. The centerpiece of the story is General Tadamichi Kuribayashi who was personally selected by the Prime Minister of Japan to lead the defense of the island. Having spent a great deal of time in America prior to the war, he gained a respect for the American people and opposed the war itself. He is, however, aware that Iwo Jima will eventually fall to the Americans and attempts to be a stern yet sympathetic commander to soldiers whom he knows are expected to die for the honor of their Emperor. He orders his men to fight to the death but does not encourage seppuku, which is suicide by a soldier to prevent capture by the enemy. The movie depicts at least one instance of seppuku in which soldiers isolated on Mount Suribachi detonate grenades in their torsos similar to the tradition of the samurai who would stab themselves in the stomach to protect their honor. The film minimizes the amount of gore and is light in comparison to Saving Private Ryan.

The true value of the movie comes from the presentation of the Japanese perspective itself. Despite being burdened with the expectation of dying with honor for their country, many of the soldiers clearly want to survive and see their loved ones again. But the principles of their culture will not allow them to do so without sacrificing respect at home. The flashbacks to the soldiers’ lives prior to the war are less distracting and less annoying than in Flags of Our Fathers and provide the realization to the viewer that war is truly hell and that no one really wants to participate. In the end, the battle is fought by the Japanese for honor but is fruitless. America would defeat Japan in less than six months and begin a half-century of alliance and healing.

Five stars for presenting a touching, realistic view of the battle from a new cultural perspective. Eastwood proves again he is an excellent director as he is a legendary actor.